Published 1979
by Law & Business in New York .
Written in English
Edition Notes
Includes bibliographies and index.
| Statement | by Barry E. Hawk. |
| Classifications | |
|---|---|
| LC Classifications | K3856 .H39 |
| The Physical Object | |
| Pagination | xv, 946 p. ; |
| Number of Pages | 946 |
| ID Numbers | |
| Open Library | OL4411342M |
| ISBN 10 | 0150039735 |
| LC Control Number | 79014899 |
judybwolfman.com: United States, Common Market, and the International Antitrust: A Comparative Guide (): Barry E. Hawk: BooksAuthor: Barry E. Hawk. Get this from a library! United States, Common Market, and international antitrust: a comparative guide. [Barry E Hawk]. This is an excellent book, and it comes at a good time, given the rapid growth of antitrust law around the world. In three parts, each a book within a book, it treats: (1) United States antitrust law ap plied internationally; (2) European Common Market antitrust law in general; and (3) developments toward international antitrust law. The English common law doctrine of restraint of trade became the precursor to modern competition law. This grew out of the codifications of United States antitrust statutes, which in turn had considerable influence on the development of European Community competition laws after the Second World War. Increasingly, the focus has moved to.
Book Review Recommended Citation Peter A. Donovan, United States, Common Market and International Antitrust: A Comparative Guide, 4 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. (),Author: Peter A Donovan. UNITED STATES, FINAL REPORT ON U.S. ANTITRUST LAWS AND AMERICAN UNITED STATES, COMMON MARKET AND INTERNATIONAL ANTITRUST: A COMPARATIVE GUIDE (); COMMON MARKET AND AMERICAN ANTITRUST: OVERLAP AND CONFLICT n (J. Rahl firms take a page from the OPEC book and double the price in exports to the United States, though Author: James A. Rahl. tion of United States antitrust law based on intended and actual effects on United States commerce); Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of Am. Nat'l Trust & Sav. Ass'n, F.2d , (9th Cir. ) (decision to apply United States antitrust law based on effects and "jurisdictional rule of reason" which takes into account the extent of. Dec 17, · Commentary Unintended Consequences: How a DOJ Antitrust Investigation Could Exacerbate Global Warming The Justice Department’s investigation into a fuel-efficiency agreement between automakers.
Every October the Fordham Competition Law Institute brings together leading figures from governmental organizations, leading international law firms and corporations and academia to examine and analyze the most important issues in international antitrust and trade policy of Author: Barry Hawk. Recommended Citation. Diane P. Wood, "Governmental Involvement and International Antitrust Enforcement," in United States and Common Market Antitrust Policies: Annual Proceedings of the Fordham Corporate Law Institute, , ().Author: Diane P. Wood. the predominant forum for discussion of leading edge international antitrust issues. Both the conference and the published volume of proceedings are eagerly awaited events on the annual antitrust calendar."- A. Neil Campbell, Vice Chairman of Committee C, (Antitrust and Trade Law) International Bar Association, and;. United States Antitrust Law in the Global Market DIANE P. WOOD* There has never been a time when domestic U.S. antitrust law was not affected by the global market. From the beginning, while the Sherman Act was being drafted, Congress recognized the close relationship between tariffCited by: 3.
